Talk:Lisp (programming language): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 16:25, 24 June 2025

Revision as of 11:58, 26 June 2025

Line 577:

I did not mention the omnipresence of the drawing in Lisp literature for brevity.

Hmm, perhaps i should add some program text layouted as cons cells, too, in the body of the article. Here is one:

[[File:S-Expression drawing example representing '(defun square (x) (* x x))'.svg|framed|center|Example representing the definition '(defun square (x) (* x x))'.]]

-- [[User:Cobalt pen|Cobalt pen]] ([[User talk:Cobalt pen|talk]]) 15:27, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

{{Reply to|Quale}} I see, that you've reverted the edit. Since i tried to discuss and clear this here, i must say I'm not amused. Please have a look at [[Cobol]], which i find a sensible use, and my comment in the 'logo' field in the [[Template:Infobox programming language#Parameters]] section. Reverting is soo simple, doing it right, not. Please be so kind to revert yourself and join the discussion again, here. -- [[User:Cobalt pen|Cobalt pen]] ([[User talk:Cobalt pen|talk]]) 11:58, 26 June 2025 (UTC)