Content deleted Content added
Cobalt pen (talk | contribs) |
→LISP "Logo": Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Reply |
||
Line 580:
{{Reply to|Quale}} I see, that you've reverted the edit. Since i tried to discuss and clear this here, i must say I'm not amused. Please have a look at [[Cobol]], which i find a sensible use, and my comment in the 'logo' field in the [[Template:Infobox programming language#Parameters]] section. Reverting is soo simple, doing it right, not. Please be so kind to revert yourself and join the discussion again, here. -- [[User:Cobalt pen|Cobalt pen]] ([[User talk:Cobalt pen|talk]]) 11:58, 26 June 2025 (UTC)
:Hey, I've discussed it here too. I think I'm not the only person who has pointed out that this article is about a family of languages, not a single language, and that the Lisp language family does not have a logo. If you claim it does, then that needs a [[WP:RS]]. Willingness to discuss doesn't mean you automatically get your way and it would help if you could make a stronger argument with some actual evidence that your artwork is a Lisp logo. You've had weeks to provide that evidence, but I don't see it. I'm somewhat more familiar with Lisp than Cobol (I haven't written 40+ years of Cobol programs, or actually any Cobol at all), so I'll leave most concerns with the Cobol article to others. [[User:Quale|Quale]] ([[User talk:Quale|talk]]) 12:48, 26 June 2025 (UTC)
| |||