Revision as of 04:35, 27 June 2025 edit Cobalt pen (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 1,645 edits →LISP "Logo" ← Previous edit		Revision as of 04:37, 27 June 2025 edit undo Cobalt pen (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 1,645 edits →LISP "Logo" Next edit →
Line 587: ::* My question is rather: Do we want the template to be used to graphically enhance the top of the article and interpret the logo field this way, yes or no. ::I'm not here to claim a non-existing logo. To the contrary. Please see my attempt to clarify the field's use in the template's definition. If we want to stay with your interpretation, i.e. a logo is a logo is a logo, then the [[Cobol]] use of the template would be wrong. ::Hope it makes my intention clearer. @{{Reply to\|Quale,}} Please understand, that you reverted the "logo" in Lisp, but not the related note in the template. Can we come to some conclusion here? Please don't duck away saying it is another ~~articles~~article's problem. How to cope with the template? -- [[User:Cobalt pen\|Cobalt pen]] ([[User talk:Cobalt pen\|talk]]) 04:22, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

Talk:Lisp (programming language): Difference between revisions