Content deleted Content added
→Nova Trex/Wang: Response |
→Nova Trex/Wang: Rewording |
||
Line 710:
:It is easy to see where such a misleading scenario can lead, by comparing the V article to other programming language articles that are using {{tq|further reading}} or {{tq|external links}}. By the misapplication of such logic, an argument could be made to remove all content under further reading or external links on all of Wikipedia. This would also get into "I don't like it" territory ([[WP:JUSTDONTLIKEIT]]).
:Per Wikipedia, {{tq|"Once notability is established, primary sources and self-published sources may be used with appropriate care to verify some of the article's content"}}. In this case, the article goes the extra step, to
|