Content deleted Content added
Line 708:
::Is there a way we can come together to work on a solution? Having these sections is valuable to give the reader a better idea into how V code is written however plagarism and violating copyright is a no-go. [[User:Jan200101|Jan200101]] ([[User talk:Jan200101|talk]]) 07:23, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
:::Confusion is being introduced as to what plagiarism and copyright are. The use of provocative words does not mean there was any violation. "Small {{tq|code snippets}}" are {{tq|'''not'''}} protected by copyright (especially common and simplistic small examples), unless more than a dozen lines of code, where they can then be considered creative enough. "{{tq|Paraphrasing}}" (especially a few words or sentences) is {{tq|'''not'''}} plagiarism or a copyright violation either. Editors of Wikipedia are suppose to paraphrase when explaining text from a reference. Examples and code snippets are {{tq|commonly used}} on {{tq|other}} programming related articles. [[User:Wukuendo|Wukuendo]] ([[User talk:Wukuendo|talk]]) 08:48, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
::::"Paraphrasing" is not copying the exact text and code from MIT licensed documentation and not disclosing it. This wasn't an explanation of the book
::::To the MIT license its a violation due to the lack of proper accreditation and because the original work was never cited or disclosed it is functionally plagiarism.
::::You are correct that small code snippets, especially those that try to achieve the same goal, tend to look the same, however this in the case the code matches character for character {{Diff|Main Page|prev|1299286929|until the naming was changed}}.
::::I'm more than willing to put up the work but you have a history of reverting other peoples changes and causing edit wars so I'm trying to find a resolution where we can work together to improve this article. [[User:Jan200101|Jan200101]] ([[User talk:Jan200101|talk]]) 12:05, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
== Nova Trex/Wang ==
| |||