Content deleted Content added
→copy pasted article contents: Response |
m →copy pasted article contents: Signature |
||
Line 714:
:::::For clarity, it was editors {{tq|'''before me'''}} that added the examples and the basic structure of the article. What later editors and myself did was to be {{tq|productive}} and elevate the draft to an article. This includes fixing vandalism and helping it survive the recent attempt to outright delete it. Coming to Wikipedia for such activities as disruptive editing ([[WP:DISRUPTIVE]]), battling ([[WP:BATTLE]]), vandalizing articles of languages that one doesn't like ([[WP:VANDAL]]), and wholesale deletionism is not productive nor what I'm here to do.
:::::Your accusations directed towards me about copyright and plagiarism are {{tq|false}}, just like the {{tq|other accusation}} about heap struct not being cited correctly or paraphrased was also {{tq|false}}. It also appears that you do not understand copyright nor does it look like you have {{tq|checked a variety of other programming articles}} to compare. You can {{tq|'''not'''}} copyright small simplistic code snippets such as {{code|1=a := 3}}. If someone changed a variable from {{code|1=z := 3}} to {{code|1=y := 3}}, that would still {{tq|not}} be a copyright violation, when the code snippet is {{tq|'''too small'''}} to quality to begin with. Something else to be aware of is that any {{tq|algorithm used}} or the {{tq|functionality}} of the code (what it does) can not be copyrighted. Meaning if someone creates a similar function or small code snippet that gives a similar result, it is not a copyright violation either (especially at the scale of a function, method, or procedure). [[User:Wukuendo|Wukuendo]] ([[User talk:Wukuendo|talk]]) 16:03, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
== Nova Trex/Wang ==
| |||