Content deleted Content added
|
|
|
{{rfcquote|text=
What should the minimum criteria for granting the TAIV user right right be? 17:01, 21 June 2025 (UTC)}}
'''[[Wikipedia talk:Featured article criteria#rfc_76423A4|Wikipedia talk:Featured article criteria]]'''
{{rfcquote|text=
Should understandability be added to the featured article criteria? And if so, which wording should be used?
# It should be added to the well-written criterion as
## '''well-written''': its prose is engaging, [[WP:MTAU|understandable]] to a broad audience, and of a professional standard;
## '''well-written''': its prose is engaging, [[WP:MTAU|understandable]] to its [[WP:audience|audience]], and of a professional standard;
# It should be a separate criterion: 1g. '''[[WP:MTAU|Understandable]]''' to its [[WP:audience|audience]].
# Status quo: no explicit mention
[[User:Femke|—Femke 🐦]] ([[User talk:Femke|talk]]) 11:45, 15 June 2025 (UTC)}}
{{RFC list footer|prop|hide_instructions={{{hide_instructions}}} }}
|
