Content deleted Content added
Stevebroshar (talk | contribs) |
Stevebroshar (talk | contribs) →Merge into OOAD proposal: Reply |
||
Line 31:
== Merge into OOAD proposal ==
Suggest merge this article into [[Object-oriented analysis and design#Object-oriented modeling]] for better organization and clarification. by [[User:Softzen|Softzen]] ([[User talk:Softzen|talk]]) 07:17, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
:No. Everything in this universe is related but we don't want to have just one WP article. We have to split stuff up. That's our job. OOM seems like a separate thing and it already has an article. Let's leave it that way. OOM is not OOAD, OOD, OOA or OOP. IMO, it should have its own article. [[User:Stevebroshar|Stevebroshar]] ([[User talk:Stevebroshar|talk]]) 13:26, 6 August 2025 (UTC)
{{clear}}
Do you agree? Please share your opinions. The reasons are:
*OOM and OOAD are tightly inter-connected. OOAD is done through OOM, and OOM activities can be elaborated into two stages or abstract levels: OOA and OOD.
|