Revision as of 13:27, 11 August 2025 edit Stevebroshar (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 5,185 edits →First sentence is wrong: new section Tag: New topic ← Previous edit		Revision as of 14:01, 11 August 2025 edit undo Chatul (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 8,448 edits →First sentence is wrong: P-code? MIX? Next edit →
Line 151: Bytecode is often _not_ interpreted! Some (many/most?) runtimes convert bytecode to native code at runtime ... via JIT compilation. [[User:Stevebroshar\|Stevebroshar]] ([[User talk:Stevebroshar\|talk]]) 13:27, 11 August 2025 (UTC) :In general, I believe that it is reasonable to describe Pascal P-code and Java byte code as machine languages for abstract machines. Do you not consider [[MIX (abstract machine)\|MIX]] to be an instruction set? :What is the encoding of the P-code for the [[Pascal (programming language)#The Pascal-P system\|Pascal-P system]]?

Talk:Bytecode: Difference between revisions