Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
SilverLocust (talk | contribs) |
Umar Halid (talk | contribs) Amendment moved to ARCA |
||
Line 122:
*:{{u|Thryduulf}}, I think that falls under [[WP:BANEXEMPT]]#2, and that's how I've always seen it handled and handled it myself. [[User:ScottishFinnishRadish|ScottishFinnishRadish]] ([[User talk:ScottishFinnishRadish|talk]]) 10:56, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
*:{{u|Newslinger}}, yeah, that should probably be fixed. It looks like it's just a supplemental page so it doesn't need a full motion so if my views align with the rest of the committee it should be a simple matter to tidy up. [[User:ScottishFinnishRadish|ScottishFinnishRadish]] ([[User talk:ScottishFinnishRadish|talk]]) 14:50, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
==Review of Indian military history extended confirmed restriction==
Indian military history topic was placed under an Extended Confirmed Restriction . While I fully respect ArbCom’s authority, I wish to raise a concern about the scope of enforcement.↵At present, the restriction appears to bar nonEC editors from all participation including talk pages and RFC's. This excludes good faith contributors. My concern is about ensuring that talk pages remain open to discussion.
Requested Amendment:↵I respectfully request ArbCom to consider allowing non EC editors to continue participating in TP discussions, so that good faith contributions by non EC editors can be evaluated. [[User:Umar Halid|Umar Halid]] ([[User talk:Umar Halid|talk]]) 14:28, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
| |||