Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Notepad++: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Creativename (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
Line 28:
* Looking at GNews, there are only a few news articles about how Notepad++ has a new vulnerability; Google search results don't turn up anything either (other than download sites). Since this is a purely online thing, I should imagine that, if it were notable, the program would be mentioned on ZDNet or other top tech news sites; it currently isn't. Doesn't appear to be notable to me, plus very few independent sources, so I'm leaning towards '''deleting''' it. --[[User talk:Iamunknown|Iamunknown]] 20:33, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' - Article needs cleaned up, Notepad ++ is a great software --[[User:207.13.77.47|207.13.77.47]] 01:04, 16 May 2007 (UTC).
*'''Keep''' - This is a significant piece of software, well worthy of a Wikipedia article. While most of the sites that speak of N++ are blogs and the numerous sites that offer it as a download, the number of them is a sign of importance. Take into account the number of downloads, the activity on the forums there, and all the ongoing work on the project and plug-ins, it would simply be odd to have no Wikipedia article on the subject. Killing it because all the "claims of notability" aren't good enough feels like a technicality. However, I would agree that the article needs some work. [[User:Creativename|creativename | Matum u mok-aan! Matum u shara-hai agh golug-hai!]] 06:17, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
| |||