Revision as of 16:50, 26 May 2007 edit EVula (talk \| contribs) 39,066 edits Support ← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:54, 26 May 2007 edit undo Ral315 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 20,640 edits →Discussion: - Re-affirm oppose. Next edit →
Line 345: #I don't like your stance on links to attack sites, and feel that this casts significant shadow over whether you have the outlook and judgement needed for an administrator. '''[[User:Daniel\|<span style="color:#2E82F4">Daniel</span>]]''' 06:04, 24 May 2007 (UTC) #Daniel and Musical Linguist make good arguments on this point. [[User:Ral315\|Ral315]] [[User talk:Ral315\|»]] 06:53, 24 May 2007 (UTC) #: I re-affirm that I continue to oppose this nomination; I believe that there is absolutely no reason to allow links to websites that willingly post personal information about Wikipedians, and this is an issue that I will not budge on, even slightly. The human impact of Wikipedia is too important. [[User:Ral315\|Ral315]] [[User talk:Ral315\|»]] 16:54, 26 May 2007 (UTC) #'''Oppose''', I'm not comfortable with the whole attack sites/Q4 thing. [[User:Guettarda\|Guettarda]] 11:36, 24 May 2007 (UTC) #'''Oppose''' answer to Q4 concerns me. --[[User:Aude\|Aude]] <small>([[User talk:Aude\|talk]])</small> 12:21, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Gracenotes: Difference between revisions