Revision as of 23:45, 26 May 2007 view source PhilKnight (talk \| contribs) Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators 140,044 edits m →[[GameTZ.com]]: reply ← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:59, 26 May 2007 view source PhilKnight (talk \| contribs) Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators 140,044 edits m Keep Next edit →
Line 5: '''Speedy delete and salt''', per previous nom. Criteria to overturn original deletion fails, per biased interest and possible sockpuppetry. (pending investigation) As expressed, strong case of article ownership. Previous AfD was no-consensus, due to obvious lack of article notability being unable to generate sufficient traffic. This nonsense is getting out of hand. [[User:Darkenedwing\|Darkenedwing]] 23:07, 26 May 2007 (UTC) * '''salt''' per second nomination. [[User:8.14.147.162\|8.14.147.162]] 23:24, 26 May 2007 (UTC) '''~~Delete but don't salt~~Keep''' - ~~problem is ownership - the~~ article subject is notable and has multiple [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22GameTZ.com%22 sources] Problem is the article relies too heavily on primary sources. Also, this is too soon since last nomination. [[User:Addhoc\|Addhoc]] 23:32, 26 May 2007 (UTC) '''delete and salt''' per [[WP:N]]. This was covered in all nominations and the deletion overturn log? [[User:198.145.112.200\|198.145.112.200]] 23:34, 26 May 2007 (UTC) *''' salt ''' as above. Can someone point out these supposed sources? [[User:Chan-change^^\|Chan-change^^]] 23:41, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GameTZ.com(3rd nom): Difference between revisions