Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lolcode: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 11:55, 2 June 2007

Revision as of 11:55, 2 June 2007

Line 6:

*'''Delete''' per nom. Only secondary source I can find is ScienceBlogs. Hardly enough. — [[User:Madman bum and angel|Madman bum and angel]] ([[User talk:Madman bum and angel|talk]] – [[User:Madman bum and angel/Desk|desk]]) 22:49, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

*'''Merge''' to [[Lolcat]] for now. This one may become notable in the future (but I doubt it...) -- [[User:Bpmullins|BPMullins]] | [[User talk:BPmullins|Talk]] 23:08, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

*'''Keep'''. We have articles on other nonsense languages. Why not this? — <font color="dodgerblue">[[User:Taggard|'''T'''</font><font color="blue">aggard]]</font> <small>(<font color="Red">[[User_talk:Taggard|Complain]]</font>)</small> 23:12, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

::Because this one doesn't have any [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] asserting, or supporting [[WP:NOTE|notability]] --[[User:Haemo|Haemo]] 23:28, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' per my comments above. --[[User:Haemo|Haemo]] 23:28, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' per nom. The only source is the language's official website (and other personal sites). It has an external link at lolcat - that's about all that can be justified at the moment. If it receives non-blog outside coverage, it can always be remade. --- [[User:RockMFR|RockMFR]] 01:00, 2 June 2007 (UTC)