Revision as of 15:38, 8 June 2007 edit Rgfolsom (talk \| contribs) 929 edits Unhelpful edits ← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:39, 8 June 2007 edit undo Rgfolsom (talk \| contribs) 929 edits →Unhelpful edits Next edit →
Line 705: The unsourced, critical personal remarks about MTA members is inappropriate in an encyclopedia article on technical analysis, as is a link to financial astrology. --[[User:Rgfolsom\|Rgfolsom]] 15:38, 8 June 2007 (UTC) The edits and comments regarding financial astrology are inappropriate and unsourced. It's true that the [[Market Technicians Association]] has not defined technical analysis, but it clearly does '''not''' include financial astrology in the [http://www.nyif.com/courses/exam_2011.html CMT course curriculum]. --[[User:Rgfolsom\|Rgfolsom]] 17:39, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Technical analysis: Difference between revisions