Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
Dachannien (talk | contribs) Revert vandalism |
||
Line 1:
The '''''Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices'' (MUTCD)
== History ==
Line 7:
Government action to begin resolving the wide variety of signage that had cropped up did not occur until the early 1920s, when groups from Indiana, Minnesota, and Wisconsin began surveying the existing road signs in order to develop a standard. They reported their findings to the Mississippi Valley Association of Highway Departments, which adopted the report's suggestions for the shapes to be used for road signs. These suggestions included the familiar circular railroad crossing sign and octagonal stop sign.
In 1927, the [[American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials|American Association of State Highway Officials]], or AASHO, published the ''Manual and Specifications for the Manufacture, Display, and Erection of U.S. Standard Road Markers and Signs'' to set standards for traffic control devices used on rural roads. This was followed by the ''Manual on Street Traffic Signs, Signals, and Markings'', which set similar standards for urban settings. While these manuals set similar standards for each environment, the use of two manuals was decided to be unwieldy, and so the AASHO began work in 1932 with the [[National Conference on Street and Highway Safety]], or NCSHS, to develop a uniform standard for all settings. This standard was the MUTCD
The MUTCD
In 1966, Congress passed the Highway Safety Act, P.L. 89-564, 72 Stat. 885 (1966), which is now codified at 23 U.S.C. § 401 ''et seq.'' It required all states to create a highway safety program by [[December 31]], [[1968]], and to adhere to uniform standards promulgated by the U.S. Department of Transportation as a condition of receiving federal highway-aid funds.<ref>Edward C. Fisher, Vehicle Traffic Law (Evanston, IL: Traffic Institute, Northwestern University, 1961) (1967 supp.): 11.</ref> The penalty for noncompliance was a 10% reduction in funding. In turn, taking advantage of broad rulemaking powers granted in 23 U.S.C. § 402, the Department simply adopted the entire MUTCD by reference at 23 CFR § 655.603. Thus, what was formerly a quasi-official project became an official one. States are allowed to supplement the MUTCD but must remain in "substantial conformance" with the national MUTCD
The [[National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices]] (NCUTCD) advises FHWA on additions, revisions, or changes to the MUTCD.
Line 17:
== Other jurisdictions ==
The '''Transportation Association of Canada (TAC)''' publishes a ''Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices'' for use by Canadian jurisdictions. Although it serves a similar role to the FHWA MUTCD
The '''Ministry of Transportation of Ontario (MTO)''' also has historically used its own MUTCD which bore many similarities to the TAC MUTCD
==References==
|