Content deleted Content added
AnnaKucsma (talk | contribs) added "listas=" perameter to biography banner |
m subst'ing templates per WP:SUBST |
||
Line 27:
SOMEONE CAME TO THE RESCUE OF THE ARTICLE AND PROPOSED A VERY SATISFACTORY TEXT. THAT HAS BEEN REMOVED BY THIS SICK USER.
Dr Prithwindra Mukherjee
We have rules against this sort of personal abuse. May I suggest that, before you attack me, and defend your version, you take a moment to look at Wikipedia policies such as [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view]]?
Line 34:
It is good to hear about the Commandments delivered from the pulpit. We presume remarks like "purple prose" are on the top of the list of wikipedian courtesy. At least, uttered by a motherly voice, they are pregnant with an urge to imitate and idolise, distribute unqualified and hasty judgments as evident by one of the users, sermoning on this article, which "can be said to be somewhat politically and to some extent ethnically [[Good Gracious!]] biased. Besides, it has still got some purple prose [[''Italic text''SIC!''Italic text'']],as [[the divine ?, why not!]] Phronima ponted out." It incites other votaries to become '''Bold text'''ruthless'''Bold text''' quite in keeping with the ''Italic text''jihad''Italic text'' decreed by saintly promoters of '''Bold text'''fatwa'''Bold text'''. Guardian of grammar, style and spelling, the Oracle may utilise "corectly" [''Italic text''SIC!] if HM so chooses, provided no un-Oxfordian dares challenge it.
P. Mukherjee 6:50, 6 March 2006.
:Dear anon, I hope you would refrain from making ad hominem attacks on other editors. This is against wikipedia's policy of [[WP:NPA|No personal attacks]]. You already made a lot of defamatory comments, and any further violations will result in blocking. Thanks. --[[User:Ragib|Ragib]] 06:14, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
| |||