Four Dissertations: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Jaymay (talk | contribs)
minor edits and additions
Line 1:
{{Unreferenced|date=December 2006}}
 
'''''Of the Standard of Taste''''', a [[1757]]an [[essay]] by [[philosophy|philosopher]] [[David Hume]], was first published in first published in [[1757]] in his ''Four Dissertations''. It was a seminal essay on [[aesthetics]] that used as its main innovation an approach focusing on the subject (the viewer, the reader) rather than the object (the painting, the book). This was revolutionary at its time, following as it did a vast number of attempts by [[philosopher]]s to define [[beauty]], all of which were destined for relative failure given the abstract nature of the term, and the manifold and varying manifestations of beauty in art and nature.
 
==PremiseSummary==
Hume begins with the observation that there is much variety in people's taste (or the aesthetic judgments people make). However, Hume argues that there is a common mechanism in human nature that gives rise to, and often even provides justification for, such judgments. He takes this aesthetic sense to be quite similar to the [[moral sense theory|moral sense]] for which he argues in his Book 3 of ''[[A Treatise of Human Nature]]'' (1739-1740) and in ''[[An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals]]'' (1751). Furthermore, he argues that this still leaves room for the ability to refine one's aesthetic palate. (Fieser, 2006, §2)
 
Hume took as his premise that the great diversity and disagreement regarding matters of taste had two basic sources - sentiment, which was to some degree naturally varying, and critical facility, which could be cultivated. Each person is a combination of these of two sources, and Hume endeavors to delineate the admirable qualities of a critic, that they might augment their natural sense of beauty into a reliable faculty of judgment. There are a variety of qualities toof the good [[critic]] that he describes, each of which contributes to an ultimately reliable and just ability to judge.
 
==References and further reading==
* Gracyk, Ted (2006). "[http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2006/entries/hume-aesthetics/ Hume's Aesthetics]", ''The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy'' (Winter 2006 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.).
* Fieser, James (2006). "[http://www.iep.utm.edu/h/humeessa.htm David Hume - Essays, Moral, Political and Literary]", ''The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy'', J. Fieser & B. Dowden (eds.).
 
==External links==