Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Relationship Approach to Systems Development: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 17:
::*I'm sorry that you've found the discussion hostile and unprofessional; I've tried really hard to make sure that the [[WP:N|criteria]] we're basing the decision on are clear to you, and been very careful not to just use Wikipedia jargon that you might not be familiar with. The heart of the discussion is whether or not RASD is [[WP:N|notable]]. What would really help show that RASD meets the [[WP:N|notability criteria]] are some sources- articles about it in trade journals, magazines, even detailed reviews of it from significant software-related web sites. The question of comprehensibility is important but secondary; if we could verify that the subject is [[WP:N|notable]], we would be open to rewriting the article so that it can be understood by a more general audience. -[[User:FisherQueen|FisherQueen]] ([[User talk:FisherQueen|Talk]]) 04:25, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
:**'''Response''' I don't know why I'm responding to this, as it does not relate directly to the AfD discussion, but here goes anyway: (1) What hostility? I haven't seen any hostility, only the wikipedia community at work (and working very well, mind you). (2) If you want more clarfication, I advise that you look at [[WP:NOTE]] and [[WP:NOT#GUIDE]]. These can be very helpful. (3) What company? [[User:Calgary|Calgary]] 04:30, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' The article is chock-full of gems like "''During the RASD Plan Phase an RASD Enterprise Application Architecture (EAA) blueprint is created. This mission critical blueprint is is necessary to ensure enterprise application design to include global functionality, regional usability and localized flexibility''" It's like something Dilbert's Pointy-Haired Boss character would write. If this is something that deserves an article, it sure as heck deserves a better one than this. Do people somewhere actually write things like this and keep a straight face? Another excerpt: "''Enable the implementer to more succesfully consolidate and/or replace legacy systems in a more orderly and logical fashion. Mitigate bugs and defects throught the incremental and iterative development build and/or deploy process.'' It's like the world's dullest magnetic poetry. [[User:Starblind|Andrew Lenahan]] - <b><FONT COLOR="#FF0000">St</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF5500">ar</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF8000">bli</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FFC000">nd</FONT></b> 06:04, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
| |||