Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Relationship Approach to Systems Development: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
delete |
del |
||
Line 23:
*'''Delete'''. This is the best example of marketese mumbo-jumbo I've read in a while. Articles in the English Wikipedia should really be in Standard English, and they should be about things whose notability is clear and verified with attribution to reliable sources. Edited to add: I am a writer. I am a ''professional'' writer. If I handed in an project that was written like this, I would be fired on the spot. --[[User:Charlene.fic|<font color="blue" face="Matisse ITC">Charlene</font>]] 06:15, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. 0 ghits, no sources, advert, not verifiable, original research, poor tone.-'''[[User:HisSpaceResearch|h i s]]''' <sup>''[[User talk:HisSpaceResearch|s p a c e]]''</sup> <sub>'''[[Special:Contributions/HisSpaceResearch|r e s e a r c h]]'''</sub> 10:32, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Non-notable. Spam. -- [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] 10:55, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
| |||