Wikipedia talk:Template index/User talk namespace/Archive 7: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
MiszaBot II (talk | contribs)
MiszaBot II (talk | contribs)
Line 931:
I think we could do with a warning just like <nowiki>{{uw-bv}}</nowiki> except for spam. It's inappropriate to give someone a 'last warning' or 'only warning' template for their first offense, but when it's blatant advertising, which it usually is, something gentler but making it clear that they can be blocked without further notice if they persist would help. <nowiki>{{uw-bs}}</nowiki>, anyone? [[User:Richard001|Richard001]] 00:41, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
:Hmm...I think you can just use uw-spam4im. I really don't see how you can decide when to use bv and 4im anyway. Also, we may be feeding the vandals with that proposed template name. :) [[User:R|'''R''']] <sup>[[User_talk:R|Parlate]]</sup><small>[[Special:Contributions/R|Contribs]]<sub>[[Special:Emailuser/R|@]]</sub> (Let's Go Yankees!)</small> 01:23, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
== Copyvio warning? ==
 
Am I not seeing it or do we not have a uw-copyvio or similar warning? --[[User:ElKevbo|ElKevbo]] 02:22, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
:{{tl|uw-copyright}}, and {{tl|uw-copyright-link}}? [[User:Anomie|Anomie]] 02:30, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
::I'll take that as a "you were not seeing." :) Thanks! Don't know how I missed them... --[[User:ElKevbo|ElKevbo]] 02:41, 11 July 2007 (UTC)