Content deleted Content added
Ham Pastrami (talk | contribs) |
Ham Pastrami (talk | contribs) Inclusion criteria |
||
Line 41:
: Although that sounds reasonable, if you ask Java developers what they use, a lot of them will say "Eclipse". I'll change the page to say "Eclipse JDT" just to make it clear what project they are using, but removing the word "Eclipse" from that line would be hopelessly confusing. [[User:William Pietri|William Pietri]] 01:55, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
:Thanks, yes, I agree, Eclipse JDT should be used..., I know that most people confuses Eclipse the platform with Eclipse + Most commonly used plug ins for eclipse, that is why I think that from an encyclopedia point of view (neutral?) the difference should be explained (it should be about what is true, not what the majority believes... don't you think?)
== Inclusion criteria ==
In keeping with [[WP:N]] and [[WP:LIST#Criteria_for_inclusion_in_lists]] I think it would be prudent to exercise some discretion as to which IDEs are actually placed in these lists. I think the easiest and fairest way to do this is to check if the IDE has a WP article in good standing (that is, an article that has established the subject's notability and is not due for speedy deletion). Otherwise, we will inevitably get a lot of no-name and self-promoting entries that only serve to clutter the list. [[User:Ham Pastrami|Ham Pastrami]] 08:54, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
| |||