Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Objectivist theory of value: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 44:
::::::No, I'm not. I know they're different. My responses to that notice are above in my initial reply. This is about the *other* section of my response, which was concerning your remark here. Were you confused? [[User:Mister.Manticore|Mister.Manticore]] 00:44, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
:::::::I don't think it is I who is confused. [[User:Banno|Banno]] 22:30, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
::::::::If you thought I was mixing up the two statements, you were. The one was perhaps a bit less neutral than it should have been, the other was an encouragement to participate that I feel was poorly worded. Since you did reword your statement on the task list, I feel it might also have been advisable to modify the one here. If you think I'm confused about something, please tell me what. [[User:Mister.Manticore|Mister.Manticore]] 23:10, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' This process has resulted in some improvement in the article. Nice work, Bastin8. No consensus has been reached here, but I still think the article is problematic. It might be worth considering a merge to [[Objectivist ethics]]. [[User:Banno|Banno]] 00:08, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' I was going to nominate objectivist ethics and politics because those are not used popularly or in scholarly media. they seem to be neologisms created to capture and redescribe a bit of objectivist ideology. --[[User:Buridan|Buridan]] 00:14, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
| |||