Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Objectivist theory of value: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 23:37, 29 August 2007

Revision as of 00:11, 30 August 2007

Line 57:

::::::::Actually, it's a bit more complicated than that. We don't always need to follow "policy" but can at times, bend and ignore it, where appropriate. That's the point where policy meets practice or practicality. In this case, it might be more practical to give the page time for clean-up and improvement and address it later. If there's some disagreement as to whether something merits an article, it doesn't cause a problem for the article to remain around while there's not a consensus to delete. Otherwise it wouldn't be the default action. [[User:Mister.Manticore|Mister.Manticore]] 21:15, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

(continued) Of course. A large part of the advantage that accrues to the encyclopaedia from the deletion process is the improvement of the articles that results from them being listed[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Objectivist_theory_of_value&diff=153832987&oldid=152501401]. The improvements are pleasing, but not sufficient for me to withdraw the request for deletion, because the notability of the topic remains to be demonstrated within the article. But that is not a problem for the editors, since there is no consensus to delete. I suggest that this AfD now be closed with the conclusion: no consensus. Does anyone object? [[User:Banno|Banno]] 23:37, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

::I certainly don't, I'm certainly not convinced to keep, but I'm not concerned about the subject of the article being any kind of problem, so it's one of the many things that can be tabled and considered again at a later date. [[User:Mister.Manticore|Mister.Manticore]] 00:11, 30 August 2007 (UTC)