Revision as of 15:02, 31 August 2007 edit 82.29.80.122 (talk) BASIC ← Previous edit		Revision as of 19:07, 23 June 2008 edit undo 216.36.186.2 (talk) →Contradiction in Examples: new section Next edit →
Line 39: Isn't [[BASIC]] a VHLPL?--[[User:82.29.80.122\|82.29.80.122]] 15:02, 31 August 2007 (UTC) == Contradiction in Examples == From the article - "Very high-level programming languages are usually limited to a very specific application, purpose, or type of task." Then it goes on to list Python, Ruby, and Scheme as examples. I feel this is a contradiction. The three languages given as examples are general purpose programming languages with an extremely broad range of applications. I'm not sure which is the intended meaning of the term so I can't say whether the examples are okay and the leading statement is inaccurate, or if the examples are bad. From the references I checked, (but I did not go into deep detail) it appears that the examples are good and the notion that they are limited in scope is inaccurate. [[Special:Contributions/216.36.186.2\|216.36.186.2]] ([[User talk:216.36.186.2\|talk]]) 19:07, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Talk:Very high-level programming language: Difference between revisions