Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Several Monty Python sketches: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 28:
:::*Someone's typing up a transcript of the sketch and uploading it to IMDB doesn't make the sketch notable. Anyone can type up a scene from a TV show and upload it there. [[User:Otto4711|Otto4711]] 02:24, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
::::*How? My impression is that IMDB does not follow the wikipedia model of everybody editing articles, especially memorable quote articles. IMDB is used extensively in wiki as a source. Besides, shouldn't you show why Anne Elk is not notable? [[User:Pocopocopocopoco|Pocopocopocopoco]] 02:34, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
:::::*The lack of [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] that are substantially about the particular sketch demonstrate its lack of [[WP:N|notability]]. IMDB allows anyone to upload information and exercises varying degrees of editorial control over the uploaded information. Its use as a source on Wikipedia has been contentious. However, even if IMDB were an impeccable source, the existence of a transcript of a particular sketch does not establish that the sketch is notable. Existence does not equal notability. [[User:Otto4711|Otto4711]] 12:18, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete all'''. At the time this comment is written, none of the sketches have any sources demonstrating their independent notability beyond the fact that they're all Monty Python routines and therefore hilarious. If there are sources which can be added for any of them, I'll gladly review my opinion. [[User:BigHaz|BigHaz]] - [[User_talk:BigHaz|Schreit mich an]] 00:51, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete all''' These are all plot summaries that don't do the show justice. Why should they be on Wikipedia? I'm sure the vast majority of Monty Python sketches are non-notable. [[User:Fee Fi Foe Fum|Fee Fi Foe Fum]] 05:11, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
| |||