Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Several Monty Python sketches: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 31:
::::::*OK how about this one [http://books.google.com/books?id=0DZEyLWqrZcC&pg=PA127&lpg=PA127&dq=%22anne+elk%22&source=web&ots=PKU5ZhlBTe&sig=LdDonhzP2DxUpp5eGimlsg5oM34 Natural Kinds, Laws of Nature and Scientific Methodology by Peter Biggs pg 127] 'I will call such minimal contentful accounts "Elk Theories" in honour of John Clease's Monty Python character. To the increasing high brow television presenter, Miss Anne Elk lovingly repeats her ("That is the theory, it is mine, and it belongs to me and I own it, and what it is too") the theory of the brontosaurus' [[User:Pocopocopocopoco|Pocopocopocopoco]] 14:39, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
:::::::*Please read [[WP:N]]. Notability means that the subject of the article is the substantial subject of reliable sources. A one-line mention in a book of at least 127 pages is not substantially about the sketch. [[User:Otto4711|Otto4711]] 15:59, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
::::::::*The problem is that most of us do online searches as we can't be bothered to go to a library over something like this and it might be difficult to get the rigorous standards that you demand for something that was a skit over 30 years ago online. During it's time, this skit was popular, it occurred before my time but people still talked about it when I was a kid. I know your going to start putting in a whole bunch of wikipedia links like [[WP:OR]] but what can I say. This skit generates almost a thousand hits on google and there are some reliable sources like the one I mentioned above that make reference to it. Right now I don't have time to do a more extensive search at the different hits, perhaps later. [[User:Pocopocopocopoco|Pocopocopocopoco]] 20:53, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete all'''. At the time this comment is written, none of the sketches have any sources demonstrating their independent notability beyond the fact that they're all Monty Python routines and therefore hilarious. If there are sources which can be added for any of them, I'll gladly review my opinion. [[User:BigHaz|BigHaz]] - [[User_talk:BigHaz|Schreit mich an]] 00:51, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete all''' These are all plot summaries that don't do the show justice. Why should they be on Wikipedia? I'm sure the vast majority of Monty Python sketches are non-notable. [[User:Fee Fi Foe Fum|Fee Fi Foe Fum]] 05:11, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
| |||