Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Several Monty Python sketches: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
careful |
|||
Line 45:
*'''Comment'''. It is clear that the nominator has not made any effort to investigate whether these skits are notable as he says above (emphasis is mine) " It is not a measure of how many Google hits it generates (the majority of which '''I'm sure''' are fansites and other unreliable sources)". He is obviously arguing that they are not notable unless we can prove that they are notable. Given that the subject matter decades old and has many hits with a google search and given that there are 7 skits, it's time consuming for us to search through and find material showing notability of these skits. Unless the nominator can prove that they are not notable, at this point I recommend speedy keep and close this AFD, give the authors a chance to beef up the articles to show notability (say a couple months), and if the nominator really wants to, he can renominate these articles individually after the authors have beefed up the articles. [[User:Pocopocopocopoco|Pocopocopocopoco]] 00:41, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
:*You can't demonstrate the notability of the sketches so you resort to more Wikilawyering. [[User:Otto4711|Otto4711]] 04:05, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
::*I'll take that as admission that you haven't investigated whether these sketches are notable. Also, I think it's [[Pot calling the kettle black|funny]] when you accuse me of wikilawyering when you've been doing a great deal of wikilawyering above. Just look at the number of times you've linked in a wikipedia policy link above and I also believe you are trying to get us to abide by the letter of [[WP:N]] while violating it's spirit. [[User:Pocopocopocopoco|Pocopocopocopoco]] 00:55, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
*'''Keep''', as the tide against these articles may be turning per [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Philosophers%27_Football_Match this] discussion. Sincerely, --<font face="Times New Roman">[[User:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles|<span style="color:#009">Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles|Tally-ho!]]''</sup> 15:51, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
**The major difference between that discussion and this one is that a source (however useful it may have been) was provided. To use the legal term, I don't think the precedent is "on all fours" with this AfD. [[User:BigHaz|BigHaz]] - [[User_talk:BigHaz|Schreit mich an]] 22:59, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
| |||