Content deleted Content added
→Critiques of CLT: rm link (unaccessible, not in g-cache or webarchive) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 45:
==Critiques of CLT==
One of the most famous attacks on Communicative Language teaching was offered by Michael Swan in <ref>Swan, Michael (1985) in the English Language Teaching Journal
The Communicative Approach often seems to be interpreted as: if the teacher understands the student we have good communication. What can happen though is that a teacher who is from the same region, understands the students when they make errors resulting from first language influence. Problem with this is that regular speakers of the target language can have great difficulty understanding them. This observation asks to rethink and adapt the communicative approach. The adapted communicative approach should be a simulation where the teacher pretends to understand only that what any regular speaker of the target language would, and should react accordingly.<ref>[http://www.ton-van-hattum.v10.com.br/comreth.html Hattum, Ton van (2006), The Communicative Approach Rethought]</ref>
==See also==
Line 56:
==References==
{{reflist}}
* Brown, H. Douglas (1994) ''Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy.'' Prentince Hall.
* Brown, H. Douglas (1994) ''Principles of Language Learning and Teaching.'' Prentice Hall.
* Krashen; Stephen D. (1987) ''Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition'' Prentice-Hall
|