Revision as of 10:57, 12 November 2007 edit Letdorf (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 11,816 edits →occam 3 ← Previous edit		Revision as of 01:22, 14 November 2007 edit undo Gwizard (talk \| contribs) 111 edits →occam 3 Next edit →
Line 148: So, to summarise: myself and [[User:OtterSmith]] are in favour, [[User:Stevenzenith]] is now in favour after initial scepticism, [[User:Wizzy]] will go along with Stevenzenith, and we can assume [[User:Gwizard]] is against. I suggest the motion is therefore carried. [[User:Letdorf\|Letdorf]] 10:57, 12 November 2007 (UTC). I concede that it should be mentioned as a footnote (to 2.1). I also agree with Steven Zenith that it would be more useful to put our effort into describing the language and not focus upon resolving these historical issues. Are we endorsing a historical deception? --[[User:Gwizard\|Gwizard]] 01:22, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Occam (programming language): Difference between revisions