Comparison of usability evaluation methods: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 09:59, 29 November 2007

Revision as of 02:14, 30 November 2007

Line 1:

{{context}}

{{Onesource|date=November 2007}}

Line 10 ⟶ 11:

! Disadvantages

|-

| [[Think aloud protocol|Think Aloud Protocol]]

| [[Software testing|Testing]]

| Design, coding, testing and release of application

Line 20 ⟶ 21:

*The Environment is not natural to the user

|-

| [[Remote Testingtesting]]

| [[Software testing|Testing]]

| Design, coding, testing and release of application

Line 29 ⟶ 30:

*Additional Software is necessary to observe the participants from a distance

|-

| [[Focus Groupsgroup]]s

| Inquiry

| Testing and release of application

Line 53 ⟶ 54:

*Does not address the usability issue of efficiency

|-

| [[Cognitive Walkthroughwalkthrough]]

| [[Software inspection|Inspection]]

| Design, coding, testing and release of application

Line 64 ⟶ 65:

*The designer may not behave as the average user when using the application

|-

| [[Pluralistic Walkthroughwalkthrough]]

| [[Software inspection|Inspection]]

| Design