Talk:Comparison of integrated development environments: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 12:14, 5 December 2007

Revision as of 14:12, 17 December 2007

Line 96:

:How about we keep a uniform month/year stamp for the latest release, so that there is an idea of how active the development is, without having to include the details of version numbers? At least, to me it doesn't seem like comparing version numbers from two different programs really makes sense. [[User:Ham Pastrami|Ham Pastrami]] 10:11, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

:Since there have been no more comments, I am removing version numbers from the table. The uniform display will be month and year. BTW, all information in these tables should be derived from their WP articles. The idea is that this article exists to ''organize'' information that has already been sourced and verified (or at least, is not disputed). If there is contention over the facts, take it to the IDE's article rather than using these tables as a soapbox. [[User:Ham Pastrami|Ham Pastrami]] 22:13, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

:: I am in favor of adding a features area. I can implement it for all Pascal IDE, but I would like to wait until all languages have at least a skeleton of the features part. Why hasn't this idea gone forward? --[[Special:Contributions/194.39.218.10|194.39.218.10]] ([[User talk:194.39.218.10|talk]]) 14:12, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

== Cygwin ==