Talk:Copy-and-paste programming: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 1:
== Expanded, organized, referenced ==
oi! I like package Util. where else do you stick stalwarts like MakeStringBlankIfNull() and AddPI() ??
I have expanded this section's discussion of copy and paste programming by experienced programmers, and rather than having it as one continuous block of uninterrupted text, I've rearranged much of the text to create two distinct major sections. Also, I have added a number of references. I believe this article now qualifies for removal of the "no references" designation, as well as the "stub" designation.
 
this page contains too many perl specific references. the code examples should be rewritten in pseudo-code and the perl package references should be dropped
 
== sweeping changes ==
Line 8 ⟶ 7:
 
I have replaced the article with a basic start on actually describing cut and paste programming, rather the in depth discussion of why it it's wrong to do it in Perl (which is what this article used to be).
 
== ??? ==
oi! I like package Util. where else do you stick stalwarts like MakeStringBlankIfNull() and AddPI() ??
 
this page contains too many perl specific references. the code examples should be rewritten in pseudo-code and the perl package references should be dropped
 
== Still wrong? ==