Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by 24.80.96.229 - "→Reflection in C: " |
|||
Line 65:
:::If you want to call this "a weak form of reflection provided by the environment", then sure, go ahead, but calling this reflection does not change the fact that ''C'' is not a reflective language, so Behdad's statement is at best misleading, and your dismissal of native reflection as "hooks and syntax" reminds me of the old adage that "you can write FORTRAN in any language". The same is doubtlessly true for getting reflection, as long as you're willing to put in all the extra work yourself. But you're getting dangerously close to just reasserting the basics of the [[von Neumann architecture]]. [[Special:Contributions/82.95.254.249|82.95.254.249]] ([[User talk:82.95.254.249|talk]]) 01:41, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
:::: There is no such thing as GNU C language, there is a GNU C compiler only. And I think that it's not useful anyways to add information about a non-standard non-portable way of doing reflection in C. Of course it can be done. In a non portable way it can be done with each compiler that has debug symbols. It's even easy, there's nothing magic in GNU C. But how does this add to the concept and understanding of the reflection concept? If you explain the concept clearly, then of course a C programmer know that he can implement it in C. It's something that should not enter in the main article IMHO. -AngeloPesce <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/24.80.96.229|24.80.96.229]] ([[User talk:24.80.96.229|talk]]) 07:04, 9 January 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
== Paradigm ==
| |||