Talk:Factor (programming language): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:13, 16 January 2008

Revision as of 17:13, 16 January 2008

Line 3:

:No less notable than [[List_of_vehicles_in_The_Simpsons|List of vehicles in the Simpsons]] or a thousand other topics here. It's had far more development and practical application than the Joy language, let alone [[Brainfuck]]. [[User:67.98.226.12|67.98.226.12]] 23:23, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

Except that hundreshundreds of millions of people know the Simpsons, and billions of people know what a vehicle is.--[[User:Congruence|Congruence]] ([[User talk:Congruence|talk]]) 17:13, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

[[User:Ceran|Ceran]] 18:52, 17 May 2006 (UTC)Aside from answering the eternal question "What would Lisp look like backwards?", no, this language isn't very notable. That said, the previous commenter makes a good point in that there are articles on far less note-worthy topics. More importantly (and surprisingly), it still appears to be under active development. As of today, the author is making regular updates to his blog at http://factor-language.blogspot.com/. So who knows, maybe this boring love-child of Lisp and Forth might actually become useful.