Revision as of 08:43, 27 January 2008 edit Brianjd (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 4,519 edits →Heinlein reference: One of my edits accidentally reverted, but I made those changes again; is RS a problem, since we are talking about the book itself; is it the topic or the term that is non-not ← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:31, 27 January 2008 edit undo Dicklyon (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers 486,013 edits →Heinlein reference Next edit →
Line 14: :::I have again made the changes in one of my edits that you reverted along with two of your edits.<br />It's not like the book is talking about something and we then reference the book; we are talking about the book itself. Thus I don't think that sci fi not being a reliable source is a problem here.<br />Is the ''topic'' non-notable or are these uses of the ''term'' "idiot code" non-notable? [[User:Brianjd\|Brian]] [[User talk:Brianjd\|Jason]] [[Special:Contributions/Brianjd\|Drake]] 08:43, 27 January 2008 (UTC) ::::No, it's not a problem. My point was just that it doesn't contribute toward establishing notability, which is still the big problem with this topic. [[User:Dicklyon\|Dicklyon]] ([[User talk:Dicklyon\|talk]]) 17:31, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Talk:Idiot code: Difference between revisions