Content deleted Content added
→Don't start with Lisp: SICP clearup |
No edit summary |
||
Line 509:
:I'm definitely in favor of also killing the "how to do it in language X" sections. Does someone else want to do that? I'd feel like I was overstepping slightly since all I've done in this particular article is delete the linkfarm. <font color="darkgreen">[[User:Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters|LotLE]]</font>×<font color="darkred" size="-2">[[User talk:Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters|talk]]</font> 15:18, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
== Closures and Objects ==
I don't believe the cited article, taken in context, supports the statement that closures are a better alternative to objects. It seems to say, instead, that closures and objects each have their appropriate place. If there are no objections, I will remove the second half of the following statement: "Closures can be used to implement object systems [2], and may in fact be better alternatives to objects [3]."
--[[User:Akellymi|Akellymi]] ([[User talk:Akellymi|talk]]) 16:09, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
| |||