Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/ImageResizeBot: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Collaboration: Thats why we log with this bot :)
Line 266:
:::::: It is my understanding that they are exempt only in so much as they have no true resolution (and then there have been arguments that they should be removed entirely because of this fact). However, they should never be rendered any larger than necessary (this would include on the image description page). In reality, you could excessively shrink SVGs without quality loss. See {{t1|SVG-Logo}}. I know it's not a policy, but it's probably a correct rule of thumb. - [[User:AWeenieMan|AWeenieMan]] ([[User talk:AWeenieMan|talk]]) 21:02, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
:::::::Then I guess we can ignore those, even if I shank it, its just as easy to make it larger again from the same source. —— '''[[user:Eagle 101|<font color="navy">Eagle</font><font color="red">101]]'''</font><sup>[[user_talk:Eagle 101|Need help?]]</sup> 08:36, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
::::::::Since shrinking won't affect the images, I wouldn't mind if you shrank them just for the sake of complying with policy. But since I gather there is both a time issue (foundation compliance deadline) and a resource issue (we can only fix so many so fast), we could do the SVGs at the end of the run, after the GIFs, PNGs, and JPGs. '''[[User:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFFF00;background-color: #0000FF;'>MBisanz</span>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 08:53, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
 
====Tracking the category contents====