Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
→Left Behind: reply to Cromis |
||
Line 36:
==Left Behind==
Hiya. You've reverted the slacktivist link off the Left Behind page at least eight times now, and it's been de-reverted by a whole variety of people. You seem to have been careful to keep it to 3 reverts in 24 hours, but just barely - four in 25 hours on the 22nd of July. And that rule is really there as an indicator that you've gone way over the line, not as a legalistic thing where you're A-OK as long as you don't break the letter of the law. So maybe you could leave it to someone else to decide to revert that link off for a while, because it sure looks to me like you're basically the only one interested in doing so right now. (As I was composing this I note you reverted my last change but left in the slacktivist link - a good sign!) [[User:Cromis|Cromis]] 02:58, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
:I'm taking it out from time to time, but leaving it in most of the time because it's on [[WP:RfC]]. It is a shame so many anonymous users want it there. It truly is a junk link that does nothing to improve Wikipedia. I don't care how many other articles have junk links too, I don't watch those. I tried to be fair by removing all the op-ed links, but we couldn't have that. We must at all costs boost some blogger's ego, no matter how shitty the content. Sad, really. [[User talk:Vikreykja|→]]''[[User:Vikreykja|Vik Reykja]]'' 03:07, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
|