Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wrath of the barclay: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 13:07, 4 August 2005

Revision as of 13:12, 4 August 2005

Line 2:

Not notable. Forumcruft. -- [[User:Karada|Karada]] 11:16, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

*'''Delete'''. nn. --[[User:DrTorstenHenning|DrTorstenHenning]] 11:19, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

transwiki to wikicities or something? Although it might be forumcruft, it is a useful explanation for over 3,000 forum users so there must be a place for it somewhere.--[[User:Caverider|Caverider]] 12:0713.50, 4 August 4, 2005 (UTC)

*'''Strong Delete'''. Forumcruft, not notable. '''Alexa rank 2,972,997'''. In response to the poster above, it would make far more sense for the forum to host its ''own'' list of trivia and in-jokes than to foist it on WP or Wikicities. Things like ''"Gary Holt Gary Holt Gary Holt Gary Holt Gary Holt Gary Holt Gary Holt Gary Holt Gary Holt Gary Holt Gary Holt Gary Holt (a typical post by Hong Kong NCFC fan XXL16)"'' obviously are only of interest to those who post there, and are neither interesting, important, or understandable by anyone else. As for the "3000 forum users" bit, the article itself states that there aren't really that many, and that many of them are sockpuppets (see the third in-joke part). [[User:Starblind|Andrew Lenahan - <FONT COLOR="#FF0000">St</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF5500">ar</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF8000">bli</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FFC000">nd</FONT>]] 12:07, August 4, 2005 (UTC)

OK, we've moved it now so you can delete it ifyou really want to *huff* :(.--[[User:Caverider|Caverider]] 14.38, 4 August 2005