Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radio source: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Radio source: Strong Keep |
→Radio source: comment |
||
Line 9:
*'''Strong keep'''—Important astronomy concept. The [http://www.britannica.com/bps/topic/488960/radio-source Encyclopedia Britannica] has an article on them, and so should we. [[User:Spacepotato|Spacepotato]] ([[User talk:Spacepotato|talk]]) 07:29, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
*'''Strong keep''' The article needs some development but to suggest that it fails on [[WP:RS]] is, well, surprising; Bradv has highlighted that aspect with some examples. On what basis was the claim of original research made? Surely not just on the absence of references: that would be irresponsible. I don't believe this article should have been brought to AfD. --- [[User:Taroaldo|Taroaldo]] ([[User talk:Taroaldo|talk]]) 07:36, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' See escalating [[Wikipedia:ANI#User:NewAtThis_at_AfD|ANI case]]. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 08:37, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
|