Descriptive set theory: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Mrw7 (talk | contribs)
same cardinality required for Polish spaces to be Borel isomorphic
the result is much stronger than that (and countable Polish spaces aren't very interesting in the Borel category, so the previous version was almost right)
Line 23:
* If ''A''<sub>''n''</sub> is a Borel set for each natural number ''n'', then the union <math>\bigcup A_n</math> is a Borel set. That is, the Borel sets are closed under countable unions.
 
A fundamental result shows that any two uncountable Polish spaces ''X'' and ''Y'' of the same cardinality are '''Borel isomorphic''': there is a bijection from ''X'' to ''Y'' such that the preimage of any Borel set is Borel, and the image of any Borel set is Borel. This gives additional justification to the practice of restricting attention to Baire space and Cantor space, since these and any other Polish spaces are all isomorphic at the level of Borel sets.