Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Web based presentation tools: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
Arx Fortis (talk | contribs) +comment |
||
Line 10:
*'''Keep''' per JeremyMcCracken, this article is pretty dubious at the moment but I am happy to assume good faith for now and allow the author to expand it. It certainly is a topic that could be encyclopedic. ~ [[User:Mazca|'''m'''a'''z'''c'''a''']] <sup>[[User_talk:Mazca|''t''a''l''k]]</sup> 20:08, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' as per JeremyMcCracken. the article brand new, so let's assume good faith and give the man some time to work before we start judging the article. constructive criticism or correcting mistakes yourself will improve things far more than "OMG! a policy violation! must delete immediately!". [[User:Grandmartin11|Grandmartin11]] ([[User talk:Grandmartin11|talk]]) 22:24, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
**Grandmartin11, I ask that you don't assume tone or intent and not read anything into my nomination other than what it states. Your comment implies an alarmist tone and approaches a personal attack. AfD is not a "must delete immediately" situation. There is a completely separate ''speedy delete'' process for that. AfD is a ''process'', not an automatic deletion. Dialog before decision is exactly why the AfD process is in place: to discuss the article's merits drawbacks before a decision is made. ++[[User:Arx Fortis|Arx Fortis]] ([[User talk:Arx Fortis|talk]]) 00:43, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
| |||