Content deleted Content added
GordonWatts (talk | contribs) m →Current status of '''''"sparked a fierce debate over [[euthanasia]]"''''' edit: correction - He answrered as I was typing |
|||
Line 346:
<font color=000099>'''"Do you have a quote from..."''' OK, when I was typing this, I had not seen your recent edit, and had an edit conflict. I may be able to scare up something concrete -and, yes, I'll try to get "both" sides of the story from "reputable main player" and with links/sources. Was hoping y'all would, but let's see what can be done...--[[User:GordonWattsDotCom|GordonWattsDotCom]] 23:00, 10 August 2005 (UTC)</font>
:Not "both", Gordon, I said, "all". I gave you a list of players. The Schindlers, Michael, the guardians (Wolfson, Pearse, Pecarek), Judge Greer, appeals courts, all were direct players in this story. What did they ALL say? Not what did "some" and "others" say. Remember the big battle we had a while ago that basically said teh court ruling is just another point of view, not truth, so report the courts point of view too. The guardian's are appointed to be in Terri's "shoes" (to quote Wolfson), so they have a point of view as well. That's four main views from actual players in the case right there: Schindlers, Michael, Guardian Ad Litems, Courts. [[User:FuelWagon|FuelWagon]] 23:14, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
| |||