Talk:PowerBASIC: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m Medcab: missed word - oops!
Line 665:
== Medcab ==
Despite any COI issues, I just want to know if there are any ''current'' problems with the article. Medcab only mediates content disputes. Is there any content dispute atm that needs to be addressed? [[User:Xavexgoem|Xavexgoem]] ([[User talk:Xavexgoem|talk]]) 21:06, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
:Apart from a need to find third-party sourcing, which is being addressed, I don't think there is a content problem; I think the Mediation was invoked on tendentious grounds. [[User:RealWorldExperience]] is an SPA focused on trying to introduce hostile material to this article based on a user forum. He has been repeatedly advised by independent editors that this is an unreliable source and that even if it weren't, his analysis of it (e.g. counting posts replied to by support staff) is original research. See [[WP:COIN#PowerBasic Part II]]. [[User:Gordonofcartoon|Gordonofcartoon]] ([[User talk:Gordonofcartoon|talk]]) 22:02, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
::I understand his worry, however; PowerBASIC is an SPA, too (no offense intended to either :-) )
::With that said, I'm going to ''close'' the case, but remain here incase of sourcing/OR disputes. Does that sound OK to everyone? <Small>this is largely because the medcab case page has gotten REALLY bloated :-p</small> [[User:Xavexgoem|Xavexgoem]] ([[User talk:Xavexgoem|talk]]) 22:26, 24 April 2008 (UTC)