Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Tile join: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Xseor: +additional request
Xseor: comment: related to another two groups of accounts?
Line 46:
 
Ongoing, long term vandalism to [[Winshill]] (continuing for almost a year, despite the page having been semi- and fully-protected on several occasions, on the most recent occasion for 5 months). The vandal's MO is to revert to a version of the article which is entirely a copyvio from [http://www.british-history.ac.uk/report.asp?compid=12371 here] as made clear by the "Copyright © 2007 University of London & History of Parliament Trust - All rights reserved" declaration at the bottom of that page. I suspect that this is one extraordinarily determined individual who cannot resist the temptation to disrupt the article where other users have made significant improvements over the last few weeks. If confirmed, rangeblock requested and check for any further sleeper accounts. [[User:DWaterson|DWaterson]] ([[User talk:DWaterson|talk]]) 20:48, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
 
:I think this is related to these two groups of accounts (I think these are blocked, but other accounts may have been created in these batches, which it may be possible to identify by checkuser):
 
created 9 April:
* {{checkuser|Pirveis}}
* {{checkuser|Crae non}}
* {{checkuser|Toluuc}}
* {{checkuser|Wvaq}}
 
created 12 April:
* {{checkuser|By 9 teen}}
* {{checkuser|Tweaf}}
* {{checkuser|Zazzes}}
Note: no contributions visible from Zazzes, but probably connected with the two accounts mentioned above.
 
What looks like it could be another group of accounts from the same vandal was created on 19 April, none have edited or been blocked yet. Of course it is likely that there were other accounts created since 12 April. --[[User:Snigbrook|Snigbrook]] [[User talk:Snigbrook|<sup><span style="color:red">(</span><span style="color:green">talk</span><span style="color:red">)</span></sup>]] 18:26, 29 April 2008 (UTC)