Dialectic process vs. dialogic process: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 02:24, 23 August 2005

Revision as of 11:36, 10 October 2005

Line 1:

In a [[dialectic]] process describing the interaction and resolution between multiple [[paradigms]] or [[ideologies]], one putative solution establishes primacy over the others. The inherent aim of a dialectic process is to achieve this state of conceptual domination.

{{cleanup-date|October 2004}}

In a "[[dialogic]] process", various approaches coexist, and are comparatively [[existential]] butand interacting[[relativistic]] within eachtheir otherinteraction. EachHere, each ideology can hold more salience in particular circumslancescircumstances. Changes can be made within these ideologies if a strategy does not have the desired effect. Thus, these entities do not necessarily merge (or become subjugated) into bigger entities as in the dialectic process, but nonetheless modify themselves (sometimes fundamentally) over the course of mutual interaction.

In a "[[dialectic]] process, one ideology wins out over the others (the very aim of such process is to achieve the triumph of one over the other).

These two distinctions are observed in studies of [[individualpersonal identitiesidentity]], [[national identitiesidentity]] and [[group identitiesidentity]].

In a "[[dialogic]] process", various approaches coexist, are [[existential]] but interacting with each other. Each ideology can hold more salience in particular circumslances. Changes can be made within these ideologies if a strategy does not have the desired effect. Thus, these entities do not necessarily merge into bigger entities as in the dialectic process, but nonetheless modify themselves (sometimes fundamentally) over the course of mutual interaction.

{{philo-stub}}

These two distinctions are observed in studies of [[individual identities]], [[national identities]] and [[group identities]].