Revision as of 01:47, 13 June 2008 edit 198.252.8.202 (talk) #Effective arguments: Added 4 missing commas, changed 1 word for vagueness, recast run-on sentence by correcting 3 grammar errors, added missing "the" and "also", and rewrote additional sentence ← Previous edit		Revision as of 01:58, 13 June 2008 edit undo 198.252.8.202 (talk) #Discussion: Rewrote paragraph to restore formal tone and correct style, grammar, and usage Next edit →
Line 52: ==Discussion== Clear and persuasive presentation of evidence will almost always be more effective than ~~what~~whatever is said on the talk pages. Almost nothing useful ever comes out of ~~arguments~~any argument between and among parties on the talk pages. The chance of ~~anything~~any ~~argued~~argument being made on other pages getting noticed or being cared about drops dramatically the longer or the more numerous ~~they~~those arguments get. If you must engage in discussion, short and simple and on the RFC talk page is probably the most effective approach. == Meta-discussion ==

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/How to present a case: Difference between revisions