Content deleted Content added
L33th4x0rguy (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 95:
:I agree the article needs a lot of work. I will do what I can within the limits of my exprtise and time - but, as you say, the input of wiki legal editors would be very useful. Another issue that needs to be borne in mind is the need to avoid becoming specific to one jurisdiction (at least one prior comment on this talk page seems to infer a belief that copyright law rests on interpretation of US legal code). [[User:Circusandmagicfan|Circusandmagicfan]] ([[User talk:Circusandmagicfan|talk]]) 21:56, 13 June 2008 (UTC)Circusandmagicfan
::Thanks for your help. I will too try to help as I can. As for varying legal jurisdictions, this should be dealt with as it is in other instances. There are some general principles that are the same throughout, but I would note that on any English language encyclopedia article for a worldwide audience will probably have reference to U.S. law. This is even more true here because many of the [[moral right]]s issues are the ones that most differ between the U.S. and other jurisdictions. So I would modify your statement only to say that we shouldn't ''exclusively'' be specific to one jurisdiction. Again, this requires the support of all parties involved. Thanks again.[[User:L33th4x0rguy|LH]] ([[User talk:L33th4x0rguy|talk]]) 20:05, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
| |||