Revision as of 19:15, 16 June 2008 edit 217.184.142.52 (talk) m ← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:04, 23 October 2008 edit undo JorgePeixoto (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 2,200 edits gzip (to give one counterexample) does not need kilobytes; I have just compressed an e-mail conversation from 713B to 468B, in UTF-8, using gzip's default -6 compression level Next edit →
Line 12: \|date=2004-01-30 \|first=Doug \|last=Ewell \|accessdate=2008-06-13 \|format=PDF }}</ref> often dramatically so. SCSU does have the advantage that it can usefully compress texts that are only a few characters long, whereas most full-scale compressors need ahundreds ~~few~~of ~~kilobytes~~bytes of data to break even against their own overhead. ==See also==

Standard Compression Scheme for Unicode: Difference between revisions